There is no denying the fact that interview is a frequently used means in recruiting prospective employees. Both employers and job-seekers attach increasing importance to this procedure. The former allocate special time and staff for this task while the latter spend a lot of time and energy figuring out answers to possible questions, not to mention the money spent on dress. However, peoples views differ sharply as to the role of interview as a selection procedure. Some hold the positive view. They claim that it is an essential step in selecting talents, while others think light of this method. personally, I believe that job interview plays an essential role in recruiting. First, interview is of vital importance in recruiting employees for such positions as actors or actresses, shopping assistants, air hostesses, models, etc, which have special demands for physical appearances, bearing and presence. These elements cannot be judged only according to self-description in the resume. This is where the proverb to see is to believe works. Secondly, interview reveals more about a prospective employee in such aspects as communicative skills and personalities. There is no doubt that communication is of striking importance in such a society featured by increasingly fine division of labor. Weakness in communication and co-operation would hinder the development and success of an entire team. Some people may be excellent in single work, but they may not be good at coordinating with others. Besides, some may have drawbacks in personalities. Yet this can hardly be seen through the resume. Therefore, interview is needed. Thirdly, through interview, the employer can have a better understanding of the prospective employees level of professional knowledge. In a society of increasingly fierce competition, some are tempted to forge diplomas and certificates or exaggerate their capacities. Interview can work as a guard against these liars. Some companies arrange a written test that goes along with job interview. This serves as an effective touchstone. It is true that interview may also prove unreliable. For instance, some interviewees may exert every effort to present themselves as knowledgeable and competent during the interview while actually they are not. However, if they can lie during an interview, they may also cheat in exams or be dishonest in their resumes. An interview wouldnt add to the risk of recruiting a wrong employee. Actually, it serves as a second check against liars. To sum up, interview is indispensable in recruiting employees in that it can tell more about a candidate.
不可否认的事实是，面试是一个经常使用的手段，在招聘未来的员工。雇主和求职者都越来越重视这个过程。前者为这项任务分配专门的时间和工作人员，后者花了大量时间和精力来解决问题的答案，更不要说花在衣服上的钱了。然而，人们的看法不同的是，作为一个选择程序的作用，面试。一些人持有积极的观点。他们声称这是一个选拔人才的关键一步，而另一些人则认为这是一种方法。就我个人而言，我认为求职面试在招聘中发挥着重要的作用。首先，面试是招聘员工作为演员，这样的职位至关重要的购物助理，空姐，模特，等等，这对外观的特殊要求，轴承和存在。这些元素不能被判断只是根据自己的简历中的自我描述。这就是谚语要看是相信的作品。其次，面试揭示了一个潜在的员工，在这样的方面，如沟通能力和个性。毫无疑问，在这样的社会中，沟通是一个突出的重要性，在这样一个社会中，越来越精细的分工。沟通和合作的弱点会阻碍整个团队的发展和成功。有些人可能是优秀的单工作，但他们可能不善于与人协调。此外，有些人可能有缺点的个性。然而，这很难通过恢复。因此，面试是必要的。第三，通过面试，用人单位可以更好地了解未来员工的专业知识水平。在一个竞争日益激烈的社会中，一些人倾向于伪造文凭和证书，或者夸大自己的能力。面试可以作为一个防范这些骗子。一些公司安排一份书面测试，与面试。这是一种有效的试金石。这是真实的采访，也可能证明是不可靠的。例如，一些受访者可能会尽一切努力呈现自己的知识和能力在面试时，其实他们是不。然而，如果他们能够在面试中说谎，他们也可能在考试中作弊或是不诚实的。面试不会增加一个错误的员工的风险。事实上，它作为一种对骗子的检查。总之，面试在招聘员工中是不可或缺的，它可以告诉更多关于候选人的工作。