The issue that who should support students to carry on tertiary education has been constantly discussed and the range have already been restricted within three stakeholders: the government, the student or the student who borrows money from the government and return it after finishing education. In terms of the first proposal, it is crystal-clear that the families financial burden will, to a large extent, decrease. As a result of this, a substantial number of students from financially inferior families tend to have the access to university education, which will surely enlarge the number of people receiving higher education, therefore contributing to development of the whole nation. The student is likely to be more independent when the third approach is chosen. If students pay for their education themselves, they will probably have several years off and make a living. Not only could this help to gain social experiences, which will help to determine their major in university they are most interested in, but they will also be more of appreciating their own efforts for accumulating such a massive amount of money for education. This will probably stimulate the student to study hard and realize value of the money they earn. With regard to the third choice, the prominent upside may lie with the students strong motivation to learn. In comparison with their counterparts, they shoulder more financial pressure and this would help them fully concentrate on their study so as to be more competitive for a job position. In this regard, there is a higher possibility for them to have a more promising career prospect. Taking all three ways into consideration, I personally would prefer students to use the loan from government and repay it after graduation. For one thing, there would be additional financial stress for the government if only the government take the responsibility. For another, if all costs are paid by the student, s/he needs to take time off for years and there might be dangers for them never coming back to school.
范文一】问题，谁应该支持学生进行高等教育不断讨论的范围已经被限制在三个利益主体：政府，学生或学生贷款来自政府，返回后教育。从第一个建议，很清楚地表明，家庭的财政负担，在很大程度上，减少。由于这一结果，大量的学生从经济上弱势的家庭往往有进入大学教育，这肯定会扩大接受高等教育的人数，因此有助于整个国家的发展。当第三种方法被选中时，该学生更独立。如果学生为自己的教育付出，他们很可能会有好几年的时间去谋生。这不仅能帮助获得社会经验，这将有助于确定他们的主要在大学，他们最感兴趣的，但他们也将更多地欣赏自己的努力，积累了大量的教育资金。这可能会刺激学生努力学习，实现他们所赚的钱的价值。关于第三种选择，突出的好处可能在于学生学习的强烈动机。与他们的同行相比，他们承担更多的财政压力，这将有助于他们充分专注于他们的研究，以便更具竞争力的工作岗位。在这方面，有一个更高的可能性，他们有一个更有前途的职业前景。考虑到这三种方式，我个人更倾向于使用学生贷款，并在毕业后偿还。一方面，如果政府承担责任，政府会有更多的财政压力。另一方面，如果所有的费用由学生支付，他/他需要休息几年，可能有危险，他们永远不会回来了。
【范文二】 Millions of topstudents coming from the humble background fail to pay theincredibly high tuition fees and thus face the risk of dropping outof the university, which becomes the focus concerned by society.peoples views differ widely as to how to help needy studentsfinish their college education, to rely on the government, toresort to educational loan, or to pay by college students. Thisessay aims to investigate the pros and cons of all these theories,and then present my recommendations. Granted, thegovernment should partly subsidize poverty-stricken students. Asfor those youngsters coming from the remote rural areas, it candefinitely provide them with equal learning opportunities andstudying materials as their peers from affluent households.Nevertheless, it will exert baneful impact on a nations finance.More precisely, it will impose much pressure upon a nationeconomically, for the ever-rising educational requirements are matched against static ordeclining financial budget. Virtually, under nocircumstances can we ignore the immense value of students loans.Ones study motivation can be stimulated under the pressure ofrefunding the money borrowed from the bank, therefore, they maycherish the learning opportunities and study even harder. Yet, thebank must undertake the potential fiscal risk if student refuse toreimburse the loans. Ideally, peoplecould benefit a great deal from defraying their expenses oneducation all by themselves. To illustrate, they are more likely todevote themselves to academic study with the hope of applying forthe scholarship. Also, they tend to embark on part-timers, whichcan not only assist them accumulating a pool of working experience,but also do them special favor in terms of tackling their tuitionposer. In practice, that would compel numerous underprivilegedstudents to forgo their dreams of receiving highereducation. personallyspeaking, to reduce the financial burden of college education,governmental subsidies and students loan all have indispensablerole to play. The ideal way is that governments partly providestudents coming from underprivileged families with financialsupport. The rest educational fees could be attributed to studentsloans. Healthy repaying system should also be set up to ensure thatall the beneficiaries could repay the money
【范文二】数百万来自卑微的出身也是无法支付学费theincredibly高从而面临下降的风险从大学，成为社会关注的焦点。人们的看法差异很大，如何帮助贫困studentsfinish大学教育，依靠政府，诉诸教育贷款，或付大学生。本文旨在探讨这些理论的优点和缺点，然后提出我的建议。当然，政府应该资助贫困学生的部分。至于从偏远的农村来的年轻人，这肯定都会为他们提供平等的学习机会和学习材料作为同龄富裕家庭。然而，它对一个国家的金融坏的影响。更确切地说，它会带来太多的压力在一个nationeconomically，为日益增长的教育需求与静态或萎缩的财务预算匹配。事实上，决不能忽视学生贷款的巨大价值。一个人的学习动机可以激发压力ofrefunding从银行借来的钱，因此，他们maycherish的学习机会和更努力的学习。然而，如果银行拒绝贷款的学生则必须承担潜在财政风险。理想情况下，人会受益匪浅从支付他们的教育费用全部由自己。例如，他们更可能投入到与申请奖学金的希望学术研究。同时，他们倾向于从事兼职，不仅可以帮助他们积累一池的工作经验，而且他们在应对tuitionposer特别青睐。在实践中，这将迫使许多underprivilegedstudents放弃接受高等教育的梦想。personallyspeaking，降低高等教育的财政负担，政府补贴和学生贷款都发挥的作用。理想的方式是政府部分来自贫困家庭提供学生与财政支持。其余的教育费用可以归因于助学贷款成功。健康的回报系统也应建立以确保所有的受益者可能还钱